"A perfectly silly, genius idea" -- David Letterman

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Bill O'Reilly


A nice gum photo of Bill, looking crisp and natty in the heat, as he heads into the Ed Sullivan Theater for…

Hold on, something's not right.

Is it just me, or is the gum looking a little more depressed than usual?

I know what this is about.  The gum is pissed off that it's stuck in midtown Manhattan for another hot, stinking summer, while its cousin is on vacation in the Grand Tetons.


Yeah, it doesn't seem fair.


But Bill's tie almost matches the color of the sky over Cascade Canyon.  That's something.



(FanGum photo credit: Marilyn Sargent.  Thanks for despoiling our magnificent wilderness, Marilyn!) 

18 comments:

  1. Have you ever done DNA testing of the gum to be certain of who chewed it? Or do crime labs refuse to do such jobs when they aren't life-and-death matters?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope, haven't gone that far. Pretty certain of its "origin story," and besides, no DNA technician wants to get near it.

      Delete
  2. No worries. I continued chewing it after the photo. Littering was not a "Factor."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good. Of the two pieces of gum, you definitely picked the right one to chew.

      Delete
  3. http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/bill-oreilly.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/hugh-jackman.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/jeff-daniels.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/posers.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/farewell-to-summer-2013-interns.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/08/inventory-reduction-emergency.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/p/mark-gentle.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/05/amy-schumer.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/martha-stewart.html
    http://www.celebrigum.com/2013/07/friends-reunion.html

    ReplyDelete


  4. Determining the most optimal base of the exponential scale (normalization) is difficult in practise. The base supreme t shirt corresponding to the Fibonacci scale may or may not be optimal."The precision of your estimation as well is very likely to be proportional to your estimation." Is this a rule in statistics or is this something humans normally do? If you nasty woman shirt use Fibonacci numbers, you assume, that the relative error of an estimation is about f(n 1)/f(n) = 1 goldenratio = 61 %. So if one estimates 5, people assume this implies a relative error of about 3, so a significant increase in complexity would only be 8 or higher.

    ReplyDelete